In the present arguments, there are two methods regarding devising a typical regular curriculum of teaching. The first is to encourage the training of a well known standard. Another is to setup a common core for all to gain access to and get. There are a few factors which have to be regarded cautiously when it comes to this.

The following argument will begin by considering a well known standard as a typical standard to train English. In a situation of instruction, using a well known standard to teach appears to be the simplest way to promote worldwide communication, but in the sociocultural and academic perspective it’s not always practical. Educating a prestigious selection of English might be achievable, but there are several problems we should consider in adopting this strategy. Firstly, the opinion of regular English itself is quite obscure. This case is certainly suggested in the Kingman report which states that it is the obligation of British universities to allow children to get standard English, which is their right. 

The next stage concerns Ellis’ argument that certain linguistic components are hard to get, even when you learn English in Las Vegas. For the sociolinguistic competence, which is seen as a crucial component in acquiring the use of English that is appropriate in social situations, he highlights that the acquiring of such knowledge is discovered to take quite a bit of time even with ESL. So as to get any sort of linguistic competence students want lots of publicity. Using Japan as an example, the majority of students of English will find it hard to have the opportunity to convey their thoughts in English, especially with English speakers who have it as their 1st language. It may be stated there are more chances to speak to non-native speakers than to indigenous speakers. Considering these circumstances, it would appear that acquiring English skills that are more native isn’t an acceptable target for language teaching when it comes to EFL. The English to be educated in colleges is, consequently, wealthy and filled with helpful assets to cultivate pupils’ potential. It’s not very realistic to encourage students to comply with a variety beyond their demands, after all.

The ultimate problem is that embracing a well known standard could be difficult, and English courses in Florida are no exception. As Kachru points out, given educational reality, it’s nearly impossible to talk to regular English speakers because of assets and overwhelming non-native input signals. Furthermore, the users of English are required to comply with local norms and language techniques. Because the type of English they use is so carefully tied up in their identification, some of those who use English also want to maintain the uniqueness of the English they already make use of.

Despite these three sorts of problems, from the perspective of an educator a teacher’s plan will, regardless, be to attempt to match the students’ needs, whatever they are. Teachers, consequently, need to think about the fact that some students need to, or desire to, comply with a regular standard for numerous reasons, specifically some particular objectives including academic or occupational types. In order to serve the potential condition of students, it is going to be crucial for teachers to have capabilities close to a normal native product.